Abstract:
In an attempt to establish a communication session between a first communication entity and a second communication entity, a first message is received. For example, the first message may be a SIP INVITE message. A determination is made, based on a registration message from the first communication entity and/or the second communication entity, that at least one of the first communication entity or the second communication entity is Internet Protocol (IP) version intolerant. In response to determining that the at least one of the first communication entity or the second communication entity is IP version intolerant, one or more IP addresses are adapted in messages (e.g., the SIP INVITE message) for establishing the communication session. The adaption changes/removes the one or more IP addresses to a different IP version to ensure proper IP compatibility.
Abstract:
In an attempt to establish a communication session between a first communication entity and a second communication entity, a first message is received. For example, the first message may be a SIP INVITE message. A determination is made, based on a registration message from the first communication entity and/or the second communication entity, that at least one of the first communication entity or the second communication entity is Internet Protocol (IP) version intolerant. In response to determining that the at least one of the first communication entity or the second communication entity is IP version intolerant, one or more IP addresses are adapted in messages (e.g., the SIP INVITE message) for establishing the communication session. The adaption changes/removes the one or more IP addresses to a different IP version to ensure proper IP compatibility.
Abstract:
A communication processor receives a call request to establish a communication session from a first communication endpoint to a second communication endpoint. The communication processor changes the intent of the call request. For example, the call request can be changed by automatically forwarding the call request, automatically forking the call request, automatically rejecting the call request based on the second communication endpoint being busy, and/or changing a first type of medium of the communication session to a second type of medium of the communication session. A call log manager conveys status information regarding the changed intent of the call to a call log of the second communication endpoint based on changing the intent of the call request.
Abstract:
A communication session is established between a first communication device and a second communication device. The communication session comprises a first dialog between an application server and the first communication device. The first communication device uses a first network address in the first dialog. In response to an event, such as a first network interface failing, a SIP INVITE with replaces header message is received by the application server with a second address of the first communication device. In response to receiving the SIP INVITE with replaces header message from the first communication device with a second address of the first communication device, the first dialog between the application server and the first device is reestablished using the second network address.
Abstract:
To deal with ANAT/IP version incompatibility, a communication endpoint registers with a communication system using a SIP REGISTER message. For example, the communication endpoint registers when it boots up. The SIP REGISTER message indicates that the communication endpoint: does not support the Alternative Network Address Type (ANAT) protocol or is one of IPV4 intolerant or IPV6 intolerant. When a SIP INVITE message is received with a Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer that comprises the ANAT protocol or an IP address that is opposite of the IP version intolerance of the communication endpoint, a 4XX SIP response message is sent to the sender of the SIP INVITE to indicate the incompatibility. In response, to receiving the 4XX SIP response message, the SIP INVITE is modified to be compatible with the capabilities of the communication endpoint.
Abstract:
To deal with ANAT/IP version incompatibility, a communication endpoint registers with a communication system using a SIP REGISTER message. For example, the communication endpoint registers when it boots up. The SIP REGISTER message indicates that the communication endpoint: does not support the Alternative Network Address Type (ANAT) protocol or is one of IPV4 intolerant or IPV6 intolerant. When a SIP INVITE message is received with a Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer that comprises the ANAT protocol or an IP address that is opposite of the IP version intolerance of the communication endpoint, a 4XX SIP response message is sent to the sender of the SIP INVITE to indicate the incompatibility. In response, to receiving the 4XX SIP response message, the SIP INVITE is modified to be compatible with the capabilities of the communication endpoint.
Abstract:
In an attempt to establish a communication session between a first communication entity and a second communication entity, a first message is received. For example, the first message may be a SIP INVITE message. A determination is made, based on a registration message from the first communication entity and/or the second communication entity, that at least one of the first communication entity or the second communication entity is Internet Protocol (IP) version intolerant. In response to determining that the at least one of the first communication entity or the second communication entity is IP version intolerant, one or more IP addresses are adapted in messages (e.g., the SIP INVITE message) for establishing the communication session. The adaption changes/removes the one or more IP addresses to a different IP version to ensure proper IP compatibility.
Abstract:
A request to establish a communication session with a second communication device is received. The request to establish the communication session comprises one or more routing attributes for routing the communication session. The one or more routing attributes for routing the communication session are looked up in a dynamic routing framework. The communication session is routed to a third communication device or destination instead of the second communication device based on the one or more routing attributes and one or more rules defined in the dynamic routing framework. For example, the communication session is routed to a specific contact center queue based on the routing attribute instead of initially being routed to an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system.
Abstract:
In response to a failure of a SIP dialog between a first communication endpoint and a first communication application (i.e., when a session manager fails), a first Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) INVITE with replaces header message received from the first communication endpoint. The first SIP INVITE with replaces header message comprises a Session Description Protocol (SDP) offer and a first request Universal Resource Identifier (URI) that identifies the first communication application. In response to receiving the first SIP INVITE with replaces header message, a second SIP INVITE with replaces header message is sent to a second communication application. The second SIP INVITE with replaces header message is used to reestablish all the SIP failed dialogs in order to reestablish the original communication session and reestablish the original media stream.
Abstract:
Disclosed is a system and method for creation of a SIP session between a controlling endpoint and a controlled endpoint. The SIP shared control mechanism sets up a first party control channel between a softclient acting as a CTI application and a controlled endpoint. The use of labels associated with multiple controlled endpoints associated with a user are utilized.